Experience the benefits of digital impressions with help from Dentsply Sirona
Over time it has become abundantly clear that the introduction of digital impressions and technological advances have changed dentistry. Here, we’ll discuss the benefits and applications of digital impressions.
Digital impressions are developed using either a digital video technique or images. Dentsply Sirona’s CEREC Primescan® Intraoral Scanner, for example, uses a 3D-in-motion video recording to develop scans. A single lens is used, sensors capture the 3D information from different viewpoints and create a scan with high accuracy. The alternative method relies on a series of digital images, similar to photos. Light is emitted from a laser and then reflected only from the focused target area. Once this process has been repeated and all needed 2D images have been taken, the images are retrieved and stitched together to create the scan. A triangulation technique has also been used to capture and use 2D images.
Traditionally, analogue impressions were taken and sent to the laboratory for the fabrication of single-unit crowns and other indirect restorations. Largely, elastomeric materials such as vinylpolysiloxane (VPS) are used for this purpose. These require mixing and the use of trays, and once placed intraorally must remain in place until they are fully set to properly capture and retain all the required anatomical details.
Digital impressions offer numerous benefits compared to analogue impressions. They are quicker to take and at least as accurate as analogue impressions.1,2 Other benefits of digital impressions include the following:
1 Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F, Evaluation of Operating Time and Patient Perception Using Conventional Impression Taking and Intraoral Scanning for Crown Manufacture: A Split-mouth, Randomised Clinical Study. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(31):55-59.
2 Carbajal Mejia JB, Wakabayashi K, Nakamura T, Yatani H. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2017.
Digital impressions are versatile! Depending on the application, they can be used alone or in conjunction with other digital technologies for the following:
New Patients
Initial Scan & Bite Elevation - Export into the inlab Software
Image courtesy of Dr. Bernhild Elke Stamnitz
Now, we’ll look in more detail at the efficiencies of digital impressions for the dental office and their convenience for patients and the laboratory.
The speed of acquisition and accuracy of digital scans is well-recognised. Significant time savings have been found, and it’s now possible to take a full-arch scan in less than a minute. Digital impressions improve efficiency for the office in several other ways, including:
* The information provided herein does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content and materials are available for general informational purposes only.
** Internal international patient survey – 122 patients from USA, Germany, Switzerland, Brasil, Czech Republic, 2021 For For More Information contact Consumables-Data-Requests@dentsplysirona.com.
Image courtesy of Dr. Bernhild Elke Stamnitz
Factors contributing to the convenience of digital impressions for patients include the following:
Digital impressions offer convenience equally for the dental laboratory. Since scans are saved digitally and rapidly transmitted as a file from the dental office, there is no need to collect or wait for analogue impressions. That means turnover time is reduced, as the crown (or other indirect restoration or a device) can be fabricated sooner and delivered sooner to the dental office. Plus, it is less likely that defective impressions will reach the laboratory in the first place than with analogue impressions. The convenience of rapid and clear communication with the dental office, which extends to the design phase, is another plus and saves time. Improved infection control is a further benefit – analogue impressions require rinsing and appropriate disinfection before being packaged and transported to laboratory. Additionally, the laboratory may take an extra step and disinfect analogue impressions to be certain this has occurred, to help protect the laboratory personnel.
With the many benefits that come with digital impressions, it’s easy to see why dental offices choose to go digital and why that equates to convenience for patients and laboratories.
Here at Dentsply Sirona we want to support you with products that help you take advantage of the benefits and convenience of digital impressions. With Dentsply Sirona’s CEREC Primescan® Intraoral Scanner, outstanding performance and digital impression accuracy is built in. Scanning is intuitive and accommodates hard-to-reach areas. Thanks to the 3D-in-motion video capture of information by smart pixel sensors, more data is captured in higher resolution and a full arch scan can be taken in less than one minute. Digital impressions can help you increase treatment acceptance and the CEREC Primescan® Intraoral Scanner supports a wide range of workflows, allowing you to grow your business.
Here at Dentsply Sirona, we also want to support you with our entire Online Dental Academy complete with webinars, how-to videos, and real-world examples on how to create streamlined solutions with efficient procedures and even greater patient satisfaction. Contact us now and let’s get started!
References
Gjelvold B, Chrcanovic BR, Korduner EK, aet al. Intraoral digital impression technique compared to conventional impression technique: A randomised clinical trial. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(4):282–287.
Hacker T, Heydecker G, Reissmann DR. Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burden. J Dent. 2015; 43(1):51/7.
Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F, Evaluation of Operating Time and Patient Perception Using Conventional Impression Taking and Intraoral Scanning for Crown Manufacture: A Split-mouth, Randomised Clinical Study. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(31):55-59.
Joda T, Lenherr P, Dedem P, aet al. Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: A randomised controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016.
Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, aet al. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: Evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14(10);1–7.
By using this site or downloading materials from this site, you agree that you are a healthcare professional and agree to abide by the terms and conditions set fourth in our Privacy Policy and Legal Notice.